20180821, 22:56  #1 
May 2018
233 Posts 
The new record prime gaps
Now, we know two new record prime gaps, 1530 and 1550. There are some interesting things about the new maximal prime gaps.
The merits of all of the last 5 maximal prime gaps are less than the merit of the gap of size 1476. In fact, they are all less than the merit of the 1442 gap. Is that unusual? The CSG ratios of the last few maximal prime gaps are below 0.8. There were a lot of gaps with CSG ratio above 0.8 before that. The new CSG ratios seem very low. Is that true? I believe that the next maximal gap after 1550 will have high merit and CSG ratio. It will probably be very big. 
20180822, 01:02  #2  
Jun 2015
Vallejo, CA/.
3×337 Posts 
Quote:
if a new gap were to be found close to 1.85e19 it would have to be at least 1576 to get a higher merit than 35.31 . In average the Maximal Gaps grow about 14~16 each time, {1476, 1488, 1510, 1526,1530, 1550} and very rarely over 28 in one turn, so it might take a few lucky breaks to be a higher merit than 35.31 

20180829, 18:19  #3 
May 2018
233 Posts 
I hope the next maximal prime gap is over 1600.

20181014, 19:31  #4 
May 2018
11101001_{2} Posts 
The thing to look at is the value of (glog^{2}(p)+2*log(p)*log(log(p)))/log(p). An average maximal prime gap will have a value of about 0. A big gap will have a value greater than 0. A small gap will have a value less than 0. The last few maximal prime gaps have low values.

20181027, 23:55  #5 
May 2018
233_{10} Posts 
Call the number (glog^{2}(p)+2*log(p)*log(log(p)))/log(p) the Jacobs value of the prime gap. Then, the gap with the biggest Jacobs value known is the gap of 1132 between 1693182318746371 and 1693182318747503. It has a Jacobs value of 4.3316.

20181028, 17:39  #6  
Jun 2015
Vallejo, CA/.
1011_{10} Posts 
Quote:
The Cramér–Shanks–Granville ratio is the ratio of gn / (ln(pn))2 in the case of 1132 it is 0.9206386 for the prime 1693182318746371. The next highest CSG ratio belongs to the gap of 906 discovered by Dr. Nicely in 1996 after prime 218209405436543. The CSG ratio is 0.8311 The next in decreasing order is the gap of 766 discovered by Young & Potler in 1989 after prime 19581334192423 The CSG ratio is 0.8178 

20181207, 23:39  #7 
May 2018
E9_{16} Posts 
FYI, the gaps of 1530 and 1550 both have Jacobs values of about 2. That is very low. I knew that they seemed like small gaps!
Last fiddled with by Bobby Jacobs on 20181207 at 23:41 
Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
No way to measure record prime gaps  Bobby Jacobs  Prime Gap Searches  45  20210902 15:47 
Prime gaps  Terence Schraut  Miscellaneous Math  10  20200901 23:49 
Gaps between maximal prime gaps  Bobby Jacobs  Prime Gap Searches  52  20200822 15:20 
Prime gaps above 2^64  Bobby Jacobs  Prime Gap Searches  11  20180702 00:28 
Prime gaps and storage  HellGauss  Computer Science & Computational Number Theory  18  20151116 14:21 